
OVERVIEW NEWS EVENTS GALLERY RESOURCES JOIN CONTACTS
|
|
Welcome to the new
online version of Current
Astronomy, the River Bend Astronomy Club’s newsletter of
observations, essays, and meeting reports:. It's a little bit serious
science, a little bit fun, and we look for creative ways to chronicle our adventures
in outer space as we pursue what for some of us is a fascinating hobby, for
others, a consuming avocation.
December 2007
Review
of TeleVue 13mm Nagler Type 6 Eyepiece By Bill Breeden December
14, 2007 For my 43rd
birthday, I decided to take the Nagler plunge. I already had nine eyepieces,
as follows: 26mm Meade
Series 4000 Plossl 12.4mm
Meade Series 4000 Plossl 9.7mm Meade
Series 4000 Plossl 32mm Orion
Highlight Plossl 20mm Orion
Expanse 15mm Orion
Expanse 7-21mm
Orion Explorer II Zoom 9mm Orion
Expanse 6mm Orion
Expanse
Do I really need another eyepiece? Well,
no, but I’ve wanted a Nagler for so long, and turning 43 seemed like just the
excuse I needed. My
collection began with the 26mm Meade Series 4000 Plossl that came with the
telescope, a Meade LX-90 8-inch Schmidt-Cassegrain. It was a simple and
natural progression to go for the next two Meade Series 4000 Plossls listed
above. A Plossl gives you a 50° apparent field-of-view, which is pretty
decent for all types of observing. Plossls are also nice in that they do not
suffer from kidney-beaning, which can make it hard to get your eye in the
right spot without seeing blackouts moving about the field. Plossls are also
reasonably priced. One drawback is that their eye relief, the distance your
eye must be from the eyepiece, gets uncomfortably short with shorter focal
lengths. Still, my Meade Plossls got a lot of use in the telescope. As my
experience observing grew, so did my desire for low power views. My lowest
power eyepiece got the most use, so my next eyepiece would be the 32mm Orion
Highlight Plossl. This has been nice for open clusters and galaxies, but in
my LX-90 at f/10 it suffers from some kidney-beaning. It performs better in
our 3.5 inch Celestron refractor that we use for outreach. The Orion
Expanse line of eyepieces had always caught my attention in the Orion
catalog, with their advertised 66° apparent field-of-view. I ordered the 20mm
and 15mm, and I was not disappointed.
At less than $70 each, they are incredible. These have been my
workhorse eyepieces for two years. They provide a crisp, sharp view of double
stars, planets, nebulae, and just about any object. I love these two
eyepieces so much that I almost never use them during public outreach,
because I don’t want someone’s kid touching them. Speaking of
outreach, this is where the 7-21mm Orion Explorer II Zoom eyepiece comes in
handy. Most outreach events feature planets or the Moon, and it is nice to be
able to change the magnification easily. This also impresses the public, many
of whom think adjusting magnification is the main purpose of a telescope. As
a plus, this eyepiece cost under $70, so it makes a good outreach eyepiece,
since I don’t flinch every time a kid’s fingers go for it. The last
two eyepieces completed my Orion Expanse collection. They are nice, but the
15mm and 20mm Expanses are far better. At the 9mm and 6mm focal lengths,
kidney-beaning is annoyingly noticeable, and you have to work at it to get a
good view. When you do get the view, it is clear and sharp, so I save these
for the occasional look at a planet under high power. Now, why do
I need a 10th eyepiece? In some ways, I don’t see it that way. I
see it as my first serious eyepiece. TeleVue had just released their new
Ethos eyepiece, with a stunning 100° apparent field-of-view, and to celebrate
they were selling their other eyepieces at 13% off. What a perfect time to
join the TeleVue family. I made up my mind to get my first Nagler and this
was the time to do it! TeleVue
Nagler eyepieces boast a wonderful 82° apparent field-of-view, the largest
available until the release of the Ethos. 82° still made me salivate to think
about it. Now that my mind was made up, I had to choose a focal length.
TeleVue’s website has a section aimed at 8-inch SCT owners, and the 13mm
Nagler Type 6 is listed under “medium power.”
The 13mm has an actual field of view of 0.50° with my telescope, the
same as my 26mm Meade Series 4000 Plossl and my 20mm Orion Expanse. Wow! If I read that right, the 13mm Nagler Type
6 eyepiece will give me the same actual field of view as my 26mm Plossl, but with twice the magnification! How on Earth is this possible? How can an eyepiece
with half the focal length (13mm vs. 26mm) give me the same actual amount of sky? It took me some time to wrap my
brain around the concept of apparent
field-of-view. It’s like the difference between looking through a paper
towel tube and a soda straw. Both provide a magnification of 1x, but the
paper towel tube shows you more sky. I guess that makes sense!
TeleVue
Nagler 13mm Type 6 Eyepiece Specifications Focal
Length: 13mm, Barrel Size: 1.25 in., Apparent Field-of-View: 82°, Actual
Field-of-View with 2000mm f/10 SCT: 0.50°, Weight: 6.4 oz., Price: $290.00 It was time
to take the eyepiece out and see what it can do. As luck would have it, it’s also
Mars season, a time when Mars is growing very near to the Earth in its orbit.
In my 2nd-magnitude light-polluted backyard, Mars would be a great
target to observe. So, on December 13, I set up my telescope, found Mars in
my 26mm Plossl, and then switched to the Nagler. Oh.my.goodness! What a view!
155x, the power I get at 13mm, is enough to show some surface markings on the
Red Planet, as well as one of the polar caps! Mars is now about 14” wide, and
surrounded with the 82° apparent field-of-view, it was simply breathtaking. How would a
deep-sky object look through this eyepiece? Too bad I haven’t yet had the
chance to trot out to dark site to try it. I pointed my telescope at the
Orion Nebula (M42), and took a look. Gulp! 155x is enough power to pull the
nebula out of the horrid light pollution, and 0.50° actual sky is enough to
give me a good view of M42. The Trapezium showed five stars, instead of the four I usually see. This was
fantastic. The Double
Cluster (NGC869 and NGC884) looks absolutely spectacular in this eyepiece.
Although my f/10 telescope doesn’t give this eyepiece as much sky as an f/5
Dobsonian would, it is still a wonderful wide-field view, and I can see one
entire cluster and the very edge of the other one. This is how much I see with
the 26mm Plossl, but my view in the Nagler is huge, and it is much less
affected by light pollution. This
eyepiece cost me $262 after the 13%-off sale, with tax, shipping, and
handling. Even though I have not yet used it under a dark sky, I can say this
eyepiece was worth every cent. I spent a whole hour staring trance-like at
Mars. This eyepiece makes me feel as if I have a whole new telescope, and
actually makes it possible to do more stargazing from my light-polluted
backyard. I only wish I hadn’t waited so long! If I had it to do over again,
I would have just five eyepieces: The 26mm Plossl that came with my
telescope, a 12.4mm Plossl, and 3 TeleVue eyepieces. The two Plossls would be
for outreach (low and medium power), and the three TeleVues would be for my
viewing pleasure. Clear
Skies, Bill
Breeden, St. Louis, Missouri River Bend
Astronomy Club
River Bend
Astronomy Club meeting and Christmas Party, December 8, 2007. Front, left to
right: Bill Breeden and Gary Kronk. Back, left to right: Bill Kolling, Mike
Veith, and Lee Paul. Members enjoyed good fun, good friends, and plenty of
astro-speak. |
|
|